Mission‐critical additive manufacturing programmes often face fragmented data, incomplete material genealogy, and late discovery of quality risks. These gaps slow qualification decisions and increase the burden of producing consistent, reviewable evidence across complex supply chains.
Link parts, builds, lots, suppliers, and inspection evidence into a coherent record.
Risk-based indicators to prioritise verification where it matters most.
Structured records designed for reviewability, repeatability, and governance.
Space and defence programmes often require strong governance, controlled disclosure, and evidence that remains reviewable over long lifecycles. Our approach focuses on improving traceability and audit readiness without disrupting existing qualification frameworks.
Public content is intentionally high level. Detailed technical workflows, validation artefacts, and programme-specific information are shared under appropriate confidentiality agreements and within agreed disclosure boundaries.
In space and defence environments, evidence quality and traceability are not optional. Our approach is designed to help teams answer common qualification and governance questions without disrupting existing frameworks.
Our solution is built for organisations operating in regulated, high-assurance environments, where additive manufacturing must meet strict requirements for traceability, quality evidence, and risk control. We support teams responsible for delivering reliable metal AM outcomes across complex and security-sensitive supply chains.